"Annamarie Jagose knows that queer theory did not spring full-blown from the head of any contemporary theorist. It is the outcome of many different influences and sources, including the homophile movement, gay liberation, and lesbian feminism. In pointing to the history of queer theory—a history that all too often is ignored or elided—Jagose performs a valuable service."
—Henry Abelove, co-editor of The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader
The political and academic appropriation of the term queer over the last several years has marked a shift in the study of sexuality from a focus on supposedly essential categories as gay and lesbian to more fluid or queer notions of sexual identity. Yet queer is a category still in the process of formation. In Queer Theory, Annamarie Jagose provides a clear and concise explanation of queer theory, tracing it as part of an intriguing history of same-sex love over the last century.
Blending insights from prominent theorists such as Judith Butler and David Halperin, Jagose argues that queer theory's challenge is to create new ways of thinking, not only about fixed sexual identities such as heterosexual and homosexual, but also about other supposedly essential notions such as sexuality and gender and even man and woman.
The author also included a chapter featuring criticisms of queer theory, though I felt the author was somewhat dismissive of much of the critiques (many criticisms that I agreed with your simply dismissed as "misinterpreting the theory").
The theory itself, is much less satisfactory. While its basic premise makes sense (questioning the self-evidence of many categories of identity such as gender and sexual orientation). However, some implications of this theory seem to fly in the face of common sense and established knowledge. For example, one scholar quoted in the book questions the "self-evidence" of sex (male vs. female). While it is certainly valid to question the social roles/obligations attached to sex (though I would think this falls under the category of gender, not sex), but I think the self-evidence of sex itself is well established by biology and genetics. Transexualism might contradict the traditional concept of sex as a biological/genetic category, but most experts regard transexualism as a birth defect, so using it as an example to destablize traditional views of male vs. female is problematic. However, my background is in physical anthropology/human evolution, so my perspective is probably more biologically based where as queer theory appears more purely philosophical.
Regardless of disagreements with the theory itself, this book provides a thorough and interesting introduction.
This points to the stormy reception queer theory has recieved. Some have argued that this deconstruction of sexual orientation and gender serves the political interests of the right-wing, preserving male and heterosexist hegemony while undermining women's voices and progressive politics. Queer theory, like bisexuals, poses a "crisis of meaning" for many who wish to carve out a safe and protective space for gays and lesbians. As gay and lesbian studies have often relied on sexual orientation/sexual identity as a fundamental category, queer theory attempts to destablize this "bedrock," revealing the power structures and discursive limits within.
The main qualm I have with this book is its relative lack of literary and artistic culture and the role different authors and figures played in the shifts within queer culture. The book would be all the stronger for the inclusion of such material.